A new study by researchers at the University of Helsinki in Finland suggests that both having more children than average and having no children at all may be linked to a shorter lifespan and faster biological ageing.
However, the researchers caution that
the findings should not be interpreted as personal health advice. Instead, they
reflect population-level patterns that align with theories in evolutionary
biology.
Biologist Mikaela Hukkanen of the University of Helsinki explained that from an evolutionary perspective, living organisms have limited resources such as time and
energy.“When a large amount of energy is
invested in reproduction, it is taken away from bodily maintenance and repair
mechanisms, which could reduce lifespan,” Hukkanen said.
Previous studies have suggested that
having more children can be associated with lower wealth later in life. But
most of that research focused on only one or two factors—such as the age at
which a woman had her first child or the total number of children she had.
In the new study, researchers took a
broader approach by examining the relationship between childbearing history and
mortality.
“They analysed data from 14,836 women
who were all twins, a design that helped reduce the influence of genetic
differences. In addition, a subset of 1,054 participants was assessed for
biological ageing markers.
Participants were divided
into seven groups based on the number of children they had and the timing of
their pregnancies, including a separate group of women who had never had
children.
The analysis found that
women who had no children and those in the highest group—who had an average of
6.8 children—tended to show higher risks of mortality and faster biological
ageing.
Women who had children at a
younger age also appeared to age biologically faster and had shorter lifespans.
However, this link largely
disappeared after researchers accounted for other factors such as alcohol use
and body mass index (BMI).
By contrast, the
association between increased ageing risk and both childlessness and having a
large number of children remained even after adjusting for these factors.
The lowest levels of
biological ageing and mortality risk were observed among women who had an
average number of children around two to three and who had their pregnancies
between the ages of 24 and 38.
Epigeneticist Miina
Ollikainen, also from the University of Helsinki, said life-history decisions
can leave measurable biological effects long before old age.
“In some of our analyses, having a
child at a young age was also associated with biological ageing,” Ollikainen
said. “This may relate to evolutionary theory, where natural selection can
favour earlier reproduction—even if it carries health-related costs linked to
ageing.”
The researchers emphasised
that the results do not prove a direct cause-and-effect relationship.
Instead, they highlight
statistical associations observed across a large population.
Many other factors
influence lifespan and biological ageing, the researchers noted, and the
findings should be interpreted alongside other studies that point to potential
health and social benefits of parenthood.
“An individual woman should
therefore not consider changing her own plans or wishes regarding children
based on these findings,” Ollikainen said.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for visiting our blog, your comments keeps us going
Contact Information
08066953052
yetundeonanuga858@gmail.com
If you are interested in publicizing your products and services on these platform, get across to the Beautyfulmakeover media team using the details above.
kindly disregard any other contact information you receive through any other source.